Is Shadow AI Going to Be Worse Than Shadow IT in Healthcare?

The evolution of technology in healthcare has always been a double-edged sword. On one hand, innovations like electronic health records, telemedicine, and AI diagnostics promise to revolutionize patient care. On the other hand, they introduce new challenges related to security, privacy, and management. A prominent challenge of the past decade has been “Shadow IT,” where healthcare professionals adopt unauthorized tech solutions. But now, there’s a new player on the horizon: Shadow AI. And it might be an even bigger concern.

What is Shadow IT?

Before diving into Shadow AI, let’s recap Shadow IT. It refers to any information technology adopted without explicit organizational approval. In healthcare, this could be as simple as a department using a non-approved messaging app, or more complex like a cloud-based patient data storage solution. The intentions might be good—better communication, more efficient data access—but the risks can be high. Non-approved software might not be HIPAA compliant or could introduce vulnerabilities into an organization’s IT ecosystem.

Enter Shadow AI

Shadow AI is a logical progression from Shadow IT. It includes any artificial intelligence solutions implemented without the proper oversight or integration into the broader IT infrastructure. This could be a chatbot introduced to a clinic’s website for patient queries or an AI algorithm a radiologist uses to assist with diagnoses.

The adoption of Shadow AI might be driven by:

– The desire to enhance patient care.

– Speed up diagnosis processes.

– Reduce the workload on medical staff.

But the implications of Shadow AI can be more severe than Shadow IT.

Why Might Shadow AI Be Worse?

1. Complexity: Unlike traditional software, AI models evolve and learn. If not appropriately managed, they can start producing inaccurate or biased results, directly impacting patient care.

2. Data Sensitivity: AI models, especially in healthcare, operate on sensitive data. Shadow AI might not adhere to the same data protection standards as approved AI solutions, putting patient data at risk.

3. Dependency: Once integrated into daily operations, medical professionals might grow dependent on AI models for decision-making. If these AI models aren’t validated or appropriately maintained, it can lead to persistent medical inaccuracies.

4. Ethical Concerns: The unauthorized use of AI models, especially on patient data, raises significant ethical concerns. Patients might be unaware that AI is being used in their care, violating their rights to transparency.

Navigating the Challenges

Preventing the rise of Shadow AI requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Update policies to cover AI/ML development, procurement, and monitoring. Communicate to all departments.
  • Establish centralized AI Ethics Review Boards for objective risk-benefit assessments of use cases.
  • Require transparency for all models including model cards detailing testing, performance, data sources, and ethics reviews.
  • Develop internal AI/ML platforms enabling collaboration and knowledge sharing across functions.
  • Nurture data science translators, AI coaches, and other emerging roles to responsibly embed AI through the organization.
  • Promote an ethical AI culture valuing patient well-being over efficiency gains.

 The rise of Shadow AI in healthcare is a looming challenge. While its intentions—improving patient care, and streamlining operations—are noble, the potential risks are significant. But through assertive policies, multi-disciplinary governance, and cultural stewardship, healthcare innovators can ethically unleash AI’s full potential. Confronting shadow AI head-on is key to realizing that positive future.